- Waterfront 2000
- Britomart Begins
|
- Britomart Display Centre
- Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy
|
|
Waterfront 2000
Waterfront 2000 was the name given by the ACC to a number of projects designed to transform Auckland’s downtown waterfront. The main role of the Council Harbour Edge Development was to manage and complete a number of infrastructure improvement projects in the area stretching from the base of Parnell in the east to Westhaven in the west.
In 1995 New Zealand had won the America’s Cup yacht race and it was decided that Auckland would host the next regatta. Sir Peter Blake of Team New Zealand wanted all the syndicates located together with an opportunity for the Government to showcase New Zealand to the world. The Viaduct Basin was one of the projects that lay under the umbrella of the Harbour Edge Development Group.
Quality public spaces around the Viaduct harbour, eastern view along Viaduct Harbour Ave.
The Britomart development was a project under the umbrella of the Harbour Edge Development committee and was planned for completion in conjunction with the Viaduct Harbour.
|
Britomart Begins
 |
| The proposed Britomart development, an artist impression |
In 1995 Mayor Les Mills proposed “the most visionary developments that your council has ever proposed.” The “Britomart” scheme that was proposed included a five-story underground transport interchange, major high-rise development, the undergrounding of Quay Street and new public spaces.
“Jihong Lu, managing director of the company promoting redevelopment of Auckland’s 3.2ha Britomart downtown bus terminal, remains confident the project will succeed. Auckland City Council goes to the Environment Court hearing starting on August 31, to appeal against the rejection last year of the project’s last resource consent, to dewater the site. Overturning the ruling would allow the council to sell Britomart to Pacific Capital, kick-starting the mammoth redevelopment project.”
NZ Herald, 25-26 July, 1998
 |
| Proposed development along Custom Street, looking east |
The project retained the CPO, Northern Steamship Building, Wharf Police Station Building, Australis House, A.H.Nathan Building but proposed only partial retention of the Barrington Building, Old Sofrana Building, Excelsior House, Stanbeth House and Masonic Building. These would have been dwarfed by the eleven new developments.
The ground level development included a public plaza across Quay Street with traffic along a stretch of Quay Street being undergrounded. The main pedestrian entry was to be through the historic CPO, with two more entries from the public plaza above the terminal.
The project was to have five levels underground. This would provide 2900 carparks, a train station with four rail lines, the provision for light rail, an underground bus terminal, and the undergrounding of Quay Street.

Cross-section of the 1995 Britomart project
Opposition to this Britomart Project included concerns about a lack of public consultation, bus operator issues around the new underground terminal, the large financial risk, and the Resource Consent for the de-watering of the site being declined.
During the 1998 ACC elections the Britomart project was heavily scrutinised by politicians and the public.
Britomart was an election issue during the local Government Elections. “STOP! Rethink Britomart Now!” was an alliance of factions opposed to Britomart. They petitioned council to drop the multimillion-dollar project. The New Zealand Herald writes, “The petition was endorsed by 12 organisations including the Western Bays community board, and vocal anti-Britomart lobbyists such as the centre-right party Auckland Now and the NZ Institute of Architects’ Auckland branch.” Sink Britomart: lobby, 3/4/98.
The Audit Office spent more than a year conducting an all-embracing review into the Britomart project after complaints from the public. The 91 page report tabled in Parliament said Britomart was the largest development involving a local authority in New Zealand “The Britomart project has been and continues to be, controversial – the nature, scale, cost and risks associated with the development are all the subject of considerable debate.”
|